• (4.4) 17 reviews
  • MSRP: $6,159–$14,287
  • Body Style: Sport Utility
  • Combined MPG: 18-19
  • Engine: 260-hp, 4.0-liter V-6 (regular gas)
  • Drivetrain: 4x2
  • Seats: 5
2010 Dodge Nitro

Our Take on the Latest Model 2010 Dodge Nitro

What We Don't Like

  • Trucklike ride quality
  • Small front footwells
  • Rear seats can't slide forward and back
  • Uncomfortable front seatbacks (leather seats)

Notable Features

  • Side curtain airbags
  • Standard stability system
  • No manual transmission option
  • Optional 20-inch chrome wheels
  • Optional navigation system
  • R/T trim level dropped

2010 Dodge Nitro Reviews

Cars.com Expert Reviews

Editor's note: This review was written in March 2009 about the 2009 Dodge Nitro. Little of substance has changed with this year's model. To see what's new for 2010, click here, or check out a side-by-side comparison of the two model years.

The Dodge Nitro is an endangered species. You might be thinking that's because it's a Dodge or because it's a Nitro, but it's on the endangered list mainly because it's a truck-based SUV. Even before the gas-price spikes and economic meltdown of 2008, buyers had been migrating toward car-based SUVs, or crossovers, another species under the SUV genus that mutated out of traditional SUV lines and often bears a similar look. (Work with me; I'm trying to justify two years as a biology major.) This species has evolved to prosper in a changing environment because its members offer better mileage and are typically more space-efficient — without giving up what Americans have come to appreciate about SUVs: the higher ride height, all-wheel drive and a cargo hatch rather than a trunk.

Crossovers include some top sellers, such as the Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4, but because I'm sick to death of seeing Japanese products held up as superior to every car, every truck, every thought out of Detroit, I'll keep this all in the country and instead compare the Nitro to the Ford Escape, itself a popular compact-SUV-looking crossover. Even among endangered species, some individuals survive and some don't, and I suspect the Nitro isn't going to make it much longer.

Compact SUVs Compared
Dodge NitroFord Escape
Starting MSRP$22,240$20,435
Max. EPA mpg (city/highway)16/2222/28
Length (in.)178.9174.7
Width (in.)73.171.1
Height (in.)69.967.8
Cargo volume
(backseat up/folded, cu. ft.)
32.1/65.2*29.2/66.3
Cargo floor height (in.)33.329.4
Std. towing (lbs.)3,5001,500
Max. towing (lbs.)5,0003,500
Passenger volume (cu. ft.)102.599
*75.6 cu. ft. including standard folding front passenger seat.
Source: Manufacturers

The disparity is pretty evident. The Nitro is a few inches longer, wider and taller, yet it has less cargo space than the Escape when the backseats are folded. Passenger volume is just 3.5 cubic feet ahead of the Escape's. These are all reasonably close, but their gas mileage is decidedly not. Shown are the highest possible EPA estimates for both models, based on two-wheel drive and the smaller of each model's two available engines. (The Escape's 22 mpg city is with a manual transmission, but its city mileage only drops 2 mpg with the optional automatic.) The towing figures show each model's worst- and best-case scenarios. In addition to its superior tow ratings, the Nitro needs only some trailering options to increase its capacity from 3,500 to 5,000 pounds, regardless of engine choice. To reach maximum towing capacity, the Escape requires both the higher-priced V-6 and an optional trailering package.

If you want to do real off-roading, it's no contest, because the Nitro began its life as a Jeep Liberty. It has the strength and hardware to do things the Escape can't. However, the incidence of true off-road driving — the kind a Nitro could do but an Escape couldn't — is a small percentage. Beyond its towing superiority, the Nitro's advantages aren't really quantifiable.

Dead Weight on Pavement
If you don't want to do serious off-roading, the Nitro's heavy-duty construction and four-wheel drive represent a lot of dead weight the Escape doesn't have. That's a downside, but it doesn't end there: My test Nitro's part-time four-wheel drive was clearly an inferior means of keeping moving on snow and ice compared with the lighter all-wheel drive on the Escape and most other crossovers. Part-time four-wheel drive must be turned on and off by means of a knob on the center console, so already you're doing something you needn't do in the Escape, where the all-wheel drive does everything automatically.

Then you have to make sure you turn it back to rear-wheel drive when on dry (or just non-slippery) pavement. Part-time four-wheel drive has no center differential, so the front and rear wheels can't turn at different speeds — which is what they need to do when you turn. Turning starts a tug-of-war between the front and back that binds the driveline and can make the truck even less controllable. In some circumstances you can turn it on once and turn it off much later, but when going from ice to dry to ice to dry to a snow patch in an urban or suburban setting, it's more than you want to be dealing with. Granted, there are instances where the part-time system's 50/50 split would be better than the Escape's, but that's likely the exception, not the rule.

Thankfully, the standard traction control and electronic stability system made the four-wheel drive less necessary than it otherwise would have been: It kept the rear end under control when I encountered the odd slick intersection.

Not a Bad Truck to Drive
Driving the Nitro overall was perfectly agreeable. It rides differently than a crossover, but I wouldn't say it's worse. The handling is a bit ponderous, but I'm convinced buyers often buy trucks because of — not in spite of — their trucklike characteristics. I had no problem with the base 3.7-liter engine's acceleration, which is good news because the optional 4.0-liter adds $990 to the already higher-priced SLT and R/T trim levels, and it takes away 1 mpg in highway driving and — on four-wheel-drive models — 1 mpg in the city. On paper, the four-speed automatic transmission looks like a liability, and it probably doesn't help the mileage, but I liked the way my Nitro responded when I hit the gas pedal. Unfortunately, not everything you see on paper can be ignored....

Safety
Another strike against the Nitro is its crash-test performance: It scores Good in the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's frontal crash test, but it scores Marginal in the side impact and Poor in the rear impact. The side test is the great equalizer: It's the one that can be compared across different vehicle sizes and classes because the sled that rams all test subjects is the same size and weight. There are cars of all sizes and heights — including subcompacts and peewees like the Smart ForTwo — that score Good and Acceptable. A Marginal rating is hard to swallow in a truck with standard side-impact airbags. (See the full list of safety features here.)

Nitro in the Market
The bad news continues when you consider the Nitro's poor reliability history. The Jeep Liberty shares the Nitro's crash ratings and has better — but still below-average — reliability. Both models could be revived, but only the Liberty should be. Now is a time for cutting back, and it's neither necessary nor wise for all brands to try satisfying all buyers. There will always be demand for real offroad SUVs, but not like we've seen before, and the brand that should meet that demand is Jeep. With its shorter wheelbase and other provisions, the Liberty is the superior off-roader, and its Jeep heritage brings authenticity for the folks most devoted to SUVs.

If you're more interested in the crossover species, Jeep also has a compact that's a good deal more offroad-capable than the Escape and most others: the Patriot. It's affordable and the most fuel-efficient in its class, at 23/28 mpg. It has shown above-average reliability, and it scores Good in IIHS frontal and side-impact crash tests — when equipped with optional side torso airbags (Marginal without). Both the Patriot and the Liberty are built in the U.S., as you'd want a Jeep to be. Though the Nitro's disappearance could cost Dodge and its dealers some sales initially, in the long run it would make for a healthier market — something we homo sapiens desperately need.

Send Joe an email 


Read All Expert Reviews

Consumer Reviews

4.4

Average based on 17 reviews

Write a Review

Very good performing and stylish vehicle

by Al222 from Manassaa, VA on May 1, 2017

The Nitro has impressive look from outside ,come across as a tough piece of driving machine the four wheel gear performed good on tough terrain. The vehicle over-whole performance and reliability was ... Read Full Review

Read All Consumer Reviews

10 Trims Available

Photo of undefined
Wondering which configuration is right for you?
Our 2010 Dodge Nitro trim comparison will help you decide.
 

Dodge Nitro Articles

2010 Dodge Nitro Safety Ratings

Crash-Test Reports

IIHS Ratings

Based on Dodge Nitro Detonator

Head Restraints and Seats
A
Moderate overlap front
G
Side
M

IIHS Ratings

Based on Dodge Nitro Detonator

G Good
A Acceptable
M Marginal
P Poor

Head Restraints and Seats

Dynamic Rating
A
Overall Rear
A
Seat Head/Restraint Geometry
G

Moderate overlap front

Chest
G
Head/Neck
G
Left Leg/Foot
A
Overall Front
G
Restraints
G
Right Leg/Foot
G
Structure/safety cage
G

Side

Driver Head Protection
G
Driver Head and Neck
G
Driver Pelvis/Leg
G
Driver Torso
P
Overall Side
M
Rear Passenger Head Protection
G
Rear Passenger Head and Neck
G
Rear Passenger Pelvis/Leg
G
Rear Passenger Torso
G
Structure/safety cage
A
Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) is a nonprofit research and communications organization funded by auto insurers. IIHS rates vehicles good, acceptable, marginal or poor based on performance in high-speed front and side crash tests. IIHS also evaluates seat/head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear impacts.

NHTSA Ratings

Based on Dodge Nitro Detonator

Overall Rollover Rating

NHTSA Ratings

Based on Dodge Nitro Detonator

Overall Rollover Rating
Driver's
Passenger's
Front Seat
Rear Seat
Side Barrier Rating Driver
Side Barrier Rating Passenger Rear Seat
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is part of the U.S. Department of Transportation. NHTSA provides vehicle safety information such as front- and side-crash ratings and rollover ratings. Vehicles are rated using a star rating system from 1-5 stars, with 5 being the highest.

Service & Repair

Estimated Service & Repair cost: $3,900 per year.

Save on maintenance costs and do your own repairs.

Warranty Coverage

Bumper-to-Bumper

36mo/36,000mi

Powertrain

60mo/100,000mi

Roadside Assistance Coverage

36mo/36,000mi

What you should get in your warranty can be confusing. Make sure you are informed.

Learn More About Warranties

Warranties Explained

Bumper-to-Bumper

Often called a basic warranty or new-vehicle warranty, a bumper-to-bumper policy covers components like air conditioning, audio systems, vehicle sensors, fuel systems and major electrical components. Most policies exclude regular maintenance like fluid top offs and oil changes, but a few brands have separate free-maintenance provisions, and those that do offer them is slowly rising. Bumper-to-bumper warranties typically expire faster than powertrain warranties.

Powertrain

Don't be misled a 10-year or 100,000-mile powertrain warranty doesn't promise a decade of free repairs for your car. It typically covers just the engine and transmission, along with any other moving parts that lead to the wheels, like the driveshaft and constant velocity joints. Some automakers also bundle seat belts and airbags into their powertrain warranties. With a few exceptions, powertrain warranties don't cover regular maintenance like engine tuneups and tire rotations.

Roadside Assistance

Some automakers include roadside assistance with their bumper-to-bumper or powertrain warranties, while others have separate policies. These programs cover anything from flat-tire changes and locksmith services to jump-starts and towing. Few reimburse incidental costs like motel rooms (if you have to wait for repairs).

Free Scheduled Maintenance

Some automakers include free scheduled maintenance for items such as oil changes, air filters and tire rotations. Some include consumables including brake pads and windshield wipers; others do not. They are typically for the first couple of years of ownership of a new car.

Other Years